Respond, with 400-800words, to the following prompt: Reflect on your first project in our course (the rhetorical analysis of a previous writing experience)and its associated threshold concept: Good writing is dependent on writers,readers, situation, technology, and use. It may help to consider some of the following, or similar, questions:

How do you feel about the work youve done for this project?
What did you learn about rhetoric and writing (your own and in general) throughout this unit,especiallyas aresult of completing this project?
How has yourwork on this project orin this unit influenced your perceptions orunderstanding of the threshold concept that states good writing is contingent on various factors?
How might you apply this threshold concept, oranything else youve discovered in this unit, to future writing projects?
If applicable, what parts oraspects of yourpaperare you still not completely satisfied with? What might you have done differentlyin yourproject to prevent this dissatisfaction? (Orwhat might you do to youressay if you were to choose torevise it and submit it as yourOptionalRevision assignment at the end of the term?)

Include the total word count of your response with your entry. Include only your response, and not the prompt itself, in yourword count.(Note: This entry has a minimum word count of 400 words, which is double the amount most otherentriesrequire.)
Rubric:
Journal entries can receive up to 10 points:
Word Count (8 points possible) – Entries that meet the expected word count willreceive the full 8 points. Entries shorterthan that willreceive partial credit according to the proportion of the word count met.
Content (2 points possible) “ Entries that are on-topic and demonstrate a thoughtful and completeresponse willreceive 2 points. Entries that are on-topic but demonstrate a vague orincompleteresponse willreceive 1 point. Off-topicresponses willreceive 0 points.